• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Manhattan Digest

All you need to know about Manhattan culture and so much more...

  • LIFESTYLE
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • LGBT
  • OPINION
  • TECHNOLOGY

pixar

Manhattan Digest’s 2014 Oscar Chat

by Dane Benko

Best Picture

Manhattan Digest film reviewers Peter Foy and Dane Benko discuss the major categories of this year’s Oscar nominations.

Oscar, Manhattan, Manhattan Digest
“Should we talk about Animated Feature?” “YES! I love cartoons!”

BEST ANIMATED FEATURE

PF: Well, the Best Animated Feature Film category has always interested me, as some of my picks for best film of the year were actually the winners in that category

DB: And this year has surprising selections.

PF: Yeah, no Pixar!

DB: And The Croods, for some reason. Frankly three of them only have a chance, Miyazaki’s The Wind Rises, Frozen, and Ernest & Celestine.

PF: Yeah, and I regret to say I had not heard of Ernest & Celestine till the announcement.

DB: Right, me either… I don’t think it’s going to win, but the nomination itself is a huge honor for it.

PF: Still, it seems to be that Miyazaki is an almost sure-bet.

DB: Yeah, Frozen has perhaps a chance because of the surprising amount of audience fondness of it, but frankly Miyazaki is too big of a name, regardless of the fact he’s won before (for Spirited Away).

PF: Yeah, it’s just the film is being hyped as his “farewell masterpiece,” so that alone should edge it towards the Academy’s favor.  I wanted to see Frozen, but somehow it eluded me amidst the bustle of Oscar Season.

DB: Yeah, my Facebook feed is alive with talk about how awesome the songs are, and I was surprisingly engaged by the trailer, but this is the only time I’ve looked at the Animated section and felt at a loss as to where my year of movie watching went, precisely.  And why the Croods?

PF: Yeah, that does seem an odd choice.  Especially as Monsters University did receive decent critical recognition for a sequel, while it seemed like both audiences and critics were lukewarm towards The Croods.  Hey, maybe they were persuaded to nominate it just to have a dark horse in there.

DB: In the end, last year’s Oscar win for Pixar seemed a little shoed in, so all in all I’m glad to see different options this year (even though I’m a die-hard Pixar fanboy), but I don’t think Despicable Me 2 or The Croods really replace that slot.  Ernest & Celestine would be the most interesting win, but it’s already reaped a major award just by being featured. Frozen could be a surprise hit but only because audiences were surprisingly keen on it. But this year goes to Miyazaki

PF: I would agree, and I’m also totally for it. I feel that Miyazaki really has earned his coveted title as being perhaps the most celebrated animator of our generation, and has really made the medium an art form

Not only has he used animation to tell fantasy stories that appeal to all ages, but does them with a sense for wonderment and joy that most directors (including live-action ones) couldn’t even hope to capture.

I would call him the Walt Disney of Japan, but in all honesty I think he’s even greater than that.

DB:  I still am not 100% sure he’s finished in the world of animation, the last few movies he’s made grumblings about being his last, but since he seems to want this one to underline his ouevre, I respect that.

PF:  Yeah, I don’t know if this will really be his last film.  He had said that about Princess Mononoke and Spirited Away also.  But giving his age, and the acclaim and anticipation that this film is already receiving, then I feel it only builds to it’s stature for us to envision this as being his last work.  Kind of like with Jay-z’s The Black Album!  Same standard!

DB: But why The Croods?

 

Best Actress in a Supporting Roll
Showdown: Lawrence or Nyong’o?

BEST ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:

 DB:  Scrolling up, how do you feel about the Supporting Actress nominees?  I always have a difficult time with the actors segments., but it’s the actors that bring in the viewers, as the Oscars is really a celebrity showcase.

PF: Yes, very much so.  I’m happy with the Supporting Actress nominations for the most part.  I’m glad that they nominated Sally Hawkins, as I felt she gave a really strong and careful performance in Blue Jasmine, and I felt that some people didn’t acknowledge it due to Cate Blanchett’s lead.

DB:  Sally Hawkins and June Squibb are the interesting ones.  I… don’t see Jennifer Lawrence winning again.  I love Jennifer Lawrence. She’s awesome.  And she won last year.  And I think the Academy thinks the same way I think about that.

PF: Yeah, Jennifer Lawrence was great though…  and if the Academy wants to make history they may let her win as if she did win the best supporting role again this year, she would be the youngest actress to do so

DB: If the Academy Awards wants to make history (more on this when we discuss Best Picture), they’ll pick Lupita Nyong’o, which I wouldn’t be surprised to see.  She did an amazing job in 12 Years a Slave, and 12 Years a Slave is pretty much a showcase of Oscar-quality talent.  She may even be my pick.

PF: Yes, that’s true.  She gave a very gripping performance, and her performances in the film’s most harrowing scenes were simply astonishing.  She might be my pick as well, as any actress would need to go to intense places to deliver in a movie like that.  I can’t comment on Julia Roberts as I haven’t seen August: Osage County

DB: I haven’t either. Fact is I’d be surprised if it wins many, or any, awards.  I actually have the suspicion that the movie itself is different from the trailer, as the trailer seemed to highlight the reprehensible character Meryl Streep plays.

PF: Yeah, it’s not uncommon for trailers to be misleading these days.

DB: The movie clearly operates on that basis of ensemble performance.  This is one reason why it would be sort of interesting to have an ensemble cast section for Oscars.  But people’s reactions to it seem to be along the lines of, “I’m jealous of the dead character.”

PF:  Ha, well if one film legitimizes the necessity for an inclusion of that category then it’s American Hustle, a film I think we will be discussing quite a bit of…

 

Best Actor in a Supporting Role
“Who’d win in a fight between Bradley Cooper and Michael Fassbender?”  “I’d totally watch that.”

 

BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE:

DB: I sort of want to head this one off by saying, I like Jonah Hill and all, and I loved This is the End, but his performance in The Wolf of Wall Street seemed more like he was acting out a sketch about being in a Martin Scorsese movie, than him actually acting in a movie directed by Scorsese.  I’d even, in this list, eagerly give him the award for This is the End, because he played off himself perfectly, really subverting his own celebrity.  I think Barkhad Abdi and Jared Leto seem like good contenders to add diversity to the list, but this really seems to be a showdown between Cooper and Fassbender.

PF: Yeah, I don’t think Jonah Hill has a chance.  Barkhad Abdi is a fantastic actor though, and was just as strong a screen presence in Captain Phillips as Tom Hanks.  Jared Leto might also get my honor for “best comeback performance” of the year, but yeah, it looks like it’s a showdown between Cooper and Fassbender, and I think the Academy is likely to tip in Fassbender’s favor.

 

Best Actor in a Leading Role
“Who’d win in a fight between PT Anderson and Thomas Pynchon?” “Okay let’s focus man.”

BEST ACTOR IN A LEAD ROLE:

PF: I actually was having a conversation with someone that Tom Hanks was snubbed a leading actor nomination the other day.

DB: Oh? I don’t know, hasn’t Tom Hanks sort of proven his Academy chops?

PF: Yeah, and in actuality I don’t think his performance was quite as remarkable as the other 5 gents that the Academy nominated this year.  Although the climax to Captain Philips shows that there’s still plenty of range for the veteran actor

DB: The Best Actor category seems like one of the most competitive. It’s not surprising that many good roles were lost in the shuffle.  I honestly have about as good a chance predicting this one as a Magic 8 Ball.

PF: Yeah, I know that feeling.  I can tell you I’m rooting for Matthew McConaughey though.  In fact I wanted to see him nominated for Killer Joe last year

DB: Yeah, I can see that. The Academy has this really bad habit of awarding talent the year after the movie they deserved to win for.  It seems a lot of people feel Leonardo DiCaprio is overdue for an Oscar. I throw my support behind Chiwetel Ejiofor.

PF: Yeah, as 12 Years a Slave really is a star making performance for him.  Getting back to snubs… I still think they could of fit Joaquin Phoenix in there…

DB: Oh man…

PF: …as I felt he deserved to win last year for his incredibly unique and volcanic performance in The Master.

DB: It was ridiculous. I didn’t even see Phoenix the person in Her. I certainly saw Phoenix in The Master, and still thought he was powerful.  Oh and by the way, as a terrible Pynchon fan, I can’t wait to see him in Inherent Vice. He’ll rock Doc Sportello.  But believe me, we’ll get to discussing Her in a bit!

PF: Ha! I can’t wait to see Inherent Vice!

DB: Maybe that’s why Phoenix wasn’t put up for this year.  Next year is being prepped for a long anticipated Pynchon adaptation Oscar streak.

PF: If he wins next year, then I’ll be completely ecstatic about it!  Back to the best acting nominees though…What do you think about Christian Bale getting another nod?  I feel he might have another good chance to win, just cause it’s a role so different from what he’s played before, and he once again perfects it

DB: My opinion on Bale is best described by the scene in Rescue Dawn where he eats maggots with a …. maggot-eating grin: Dude chews scenery in a way I adore, but I wouldn’t give him an award. I feel like I’m more on a rollercoaster than watching a performance.  I’d almost feel like giving him the golden man for American Hustle would be more boring than his performance deserves.  But I’m not one of the voters, so what do I know?

PF: Bruce Dern is another likely contender.  Either for an Oscar, or a lifetime achievement award.  As you said all five of the nominees gave career highlights this year, but, who knows, maybe the average age of academy voters will dictate them voting for the oldest nominee in the bunch.

 

Best Actress in a Lead Role
“I could get into, like, Amy Adams is the only Millennial in the group or something, but they also are a broad demographic of ages.” “Yeah they’re quite diverse for rich white people.”

BEST ACTRESS IN A LEADING ROLE:

DB: Let’s start talking about Best Actress!  No in all seriousness, this is one of the better line-ups of actresses in my memory, being that women are finally not always secondary characters in their own stories anymore.

PF: Yes, very much, although I feel that Brie Larsson was snubbed for her performance in Short Term 12

DB: Oh really? I… I don’t know what that is.

PF: It’s just it was a little-seen independent film with an arthouse veneer.   So yeah, it’s not exactly the type of movie that would attract Oscar voters. I felt she just gave such a complex and hard-edged performance for that film.

DB:  Well, you certainly caught me off-guard. I was gonna mention that Melissa McCarthy should have been nominated for The Heat.  I am absolutely serious, she’s the Lou Costello of our generation.

PF: Yeah I didn’t see The Heat, but I thought she should have been nominated for Bridesmaids.

DB: But since Sandra Bullock got nominated instead for Gravity, that’s about the only segue I had to this otherwise eclectic mix of characters. Like Best Actor, I don’t even know where to start here.

PF: I feel Cate Blanchett might be the most likely contender

DB: Yeah Blue Jasmine was something else. I never thought Blanchett would top her performance in Coffee and Cigarettes.  And of course there she only had a segment.  Now she had to hold up a movie.

PF: Yeah, she gets serious props from me as she was able to balance the humor of her character against the distraught nature of her as well.  What an ending too? It was rather disturbing I found.

DB: Actually now that you use that word, pretty much all the actresses this year had disturbing roles.

Bullock’s was the most lighthearted, and it was about the grief of losing a child!  Or maybe Meryl Streep’s because we were supposed to laugh at her character?

PF: Yeah, that’s true.  Although there aren’t many years when an actress gets nominated cause of how “happy” their performance was.  Well for me Brie Larsson’s performance outshone the rest.

DB: Right. So we’re agreed. Brie Larsson should have won, and, uh… we have no clue who will win.  But we can agree that all of these actresses do a fine job at making you feel sad.

PF: Yep! Exactly!

 

Best Picture
The Big, Not-So-Red One

BEST PICTURE:

 PF: Moving onto best picture now!

DB: Well alright then. To cut to the chase, I can’t help but feel this comes down to 12 Years a Slave versus Her.  The rest of the movies are great.

PF:  Really, I don’t think Her has much of a chance of winning.  To be honest I wouldn’t have been surprised had it not even been nominated

DB: It’s been pretty much universally embraced by critics and audiences alike.  And as a separate, specific feature, it’s good up and down and through and through. Good design, good performance, good acting, good editing, and a story that seems to be hitting close to an area big on people’s minds.

Plus Megan Ellison is about as celebrity as producers get.

PF: Yeah, but it’s not exactly an Oscar-type of movie.  While it is a film about contemporary relationships, it’s also a high-concept sci-fi film that also seems aimed at indie-rock fans.

I think the two most likely picks for best picture are American Hustle and 12 Years a Slave.  The former just comes off to me as this year’s Argo

DB: Yeah but that might be why it loses…

PF: Yeah, I thought about that as well, but it also seems hard for The Academy to resist it.

DB: 12 Years a Slave seems like a good pick because in a weird way we’re overdue for the sober social consciousness film.  It also fits the Academy’s MO.

PF: Yeah, although I do notice that the Academy does still tend to like film’s that have a little bit of levity to them.  Which 12 Years a Slave certainly does not have

DB: Well in theory, the purpose of these awards are to argue for artfulness of film.  12 Years a Slave is an important film whether you enjoyed it or not.  So that sort of sets it to demand people’s, including Academy voters’, attentions.

PF: Yeah, and if we’re talking about craft, then the film is a shoe-in for best picture.  I absolutely feel that 12 Years a Slave will win for best director.  Steve McQueen really has established himself as such a visionary with only just three films.

DB: I feel like Gravity is misplaced in these two departments. Strictly speaking Cuaron is worthy of being considered for Best Director and the movie is astounding, but it is a technical showcase that should sweep whatever technical awards its up for.  But it’s kind of the odd-man-out of the rest of the titles in the Best Picture category.

PF: Yeah, well they have one of those every year (i.e. Inception)

DB: I feel like American Hustle and The Wolf of Wall Street will cannibalize each-others votes as historical looks at decadence and power.  12 Years a Slave has the biggest chops and Her has the feverish word-of-mouth. Which makes them create an interesting sort of unintentional narrative about whether the award will go to the mistakes of our past, or the hopes of our future.

PF: I don’t think Wolf of Wall Street has much a chance of winning.  But that’s fine, you can tell Scorsese didn’t make it to win an award

DB: I don’t think Scorsese made The Departed to win an award.

PF: Yeah, but he did make The Aviator to win one.  I personally think he wouldn’t have done that movie had he won an Oscar at that point, and I do feel it’s one of his weakest films because of that

DB: I wouldn’t want to answer for him. My feeling is that Scorsese is a case in point that the Academy tends to award a filmmaker about a year or two after the point when people feel the filmmaker deserves it most. Which is why Leonardo DiCaprio is either getting an award this year or next.

PF: A very solid accusation.  In fact bearing that in mind, then maybe Leo will indeed win this year as the he has said he’s going on hiatus from acting, so the academy may want to award him now before he takes off for a bit.

DB: I trust his hiatus about as much as I trust Soderbergh’s various retirements.  Film people seem to be like that one guy on message forums that’s always announcing his departure from the community. The ones that make the loudest announcements are typically the ones that can’t quit. Heck, Phoenix’s hiatus was a performance in and of itself.  Anyway, perhaps I am being too confident in Her. I just strongly feel it is the title that SHOULD win, though 12 Years a Slave is the title to beat.

PF:  Yeah, well I didn’t mention it earlier, but I would of liked to see my favorite film of the year nominated (Before Midnight).  Her and 12 Years a Slave are my favorites of the batch nominated and Her is what I feel should win, but 12 Years a Slave seems the more probable outcome.

 

MINOR AWARDS AND ERRATA:

 PF: What do you think about how Inside Llewyn Davis didn’t receive any major nominations?

DB: Don’t feel it should have. Loved the movie, isn’t as caustic and daring as A Serious Man and the Coens already settled their score with No Country for Old Men.  It still got cinematography award nomination, and it looks friggin’ beautiful.  I actually really hope it wins that category.

PF: Yeah, I liked how the film looked like the cover of a folk album.  Really evoked The Freewheelin’ Bob Dylan’s, but it wasn’t surprising to see it wasn’t nominated for best picture.  But, I don’t think the Coens really care either way.

DB: It’s also up for sound mixing but that should go to Gravity. Full dynamic atmospheric subjective sound. Llewyn Davis’ audio award should be for Music.  But those categories have to be original song or original score.

PF: Well, it will be interesting to see which movies win in the screenplay categories, as once again, this year saw so many great scripts.  Although I’m not exactly sure why Before Midnight is up for best adapted screenplay…

DB: Yeah I was wondering that as well. I guess “Adapted from the characters by Linklater.”

PF: Yeah, probably just an excuse to put the film in that category, but hey, you hardly see sequels nominated for Oscars also.

DB: It would be kind of funny if the Adapted Screenplay went to 12 Years a Slave and the Original Screenplay went to Her.  “We’ve adapted to the past, and now we’re originating the future!”

PF: Yeah I was thinking that myself.  It could very well happen too, as Her demonstrated that Spike Jonze is a talented screenplay writer, in addition to being a fantastic director, and as you said, The Academy seems due to acknowledge a somber film about America’s darkest past.

 

Filed Under: BREAKING NEWS, ENTERTAINMENT, MOVIES, OPINION, REVIEWS Tagged With: 12 years a slave, 2014 Academy Awards, 2014 nominees, A Serious Man, Academy Awards, American Hustle, August: Osage County, Award season, Barkhad Abdi, Before Midnight, Blue Jasmine, Bob Dylan, bradley cooper, bridesmaids, Brie Larsson, Bruce Dern, Captain Phillips, Cate Blanchett, Chiwetel Ejiofor, Christian Bale, Coffee and Cigarettes, Doc Sportello, ensemble performance, Ernest & Celestine, Frozen, Gravity, Her, Hidao Miyazaki, Inherent Vice, Inside Llewyn Davis, Jared Leto, jay-z, jennifer lawrence, Joaquin Phoenix, Jonah Hill, Julia Roberts, June Squibb, Killer Joe, Leonardo DiCaprio, Lifetime Achievement Award, Lou Costello, Lupita Nyong'o, maggots, Martin Scorsese, Matthew McConaughey, Megan Ellison, Melissa McCarthy, Meryl Streep, michael fassbender, Monsters University, No Country for Old Men, Oscars, pixar, Princess Mononoke, Rescue Dawn, Richard Linklater, Sally Hawkins, Sandra Bullock, Short Term 12, Spike Jonze, Spirited Away, steve mcqueen, Steven Soderbergh, The Aviator, The Black Album, The Croods, The Departed, The Heat, The Master, The Wind Rises, The Wolf of Wall Street, This is the End, Thomas Pynchon, Tom Hanks, Walt Disney

Disney Pixar announces ‘Nemo’ sequel ‘Finding Dory’ for 2015!

by Ryan Shea

Credit to: The Ellen Degeneres Show
Credit to: The Ellen Degeneres Show

 

Remember when ‘Nemo’ was a cute fish that got lost in the sea and not that awful storm that most of us had to endear a couple of months ago? Well the former is now on everyone’s minds, as Ellen Degeneres announced yesterday on her show that the sequel to Nemo dubbed ‘Finding Dory” will make its mark in theaters on November 25, 2015.

Dubbed Finding Dory, the flick will employ DeGeneres as the voice of Dory, who Disney Pixar describes as the “friendly-but-forgetful blue tang fish.”

“I have waited for this day for a long, long, long, long, long, long time,” DeGeneres said in a statement Tuesday.  This also was the result of her posting on Facebook and Instagram.

“I’m not mad it took this long. I know the people at Pixar were busy creating Toy Story 16.

“But the time they took was worth it,” she added. The script is fantastic. And it has everything I loved about the first one: It’s got a lot of heart, it’s really funny, and the best part is — it’s got a lot more Dory.”

The movie this time around will be directed by Andrew Stanton, a two time Oscar winner for ‘Finding Nemo’ and in 2008 for ‘Wall-E’.  He has also been nominated four times for Original Screenplay for those two movies as well as ‘Toy Story’ and ‘Toy Story 3’.

“She won the hearts of moviegoers all over the world — not to mention our team here at Pixar,” Stanton said. “One thing we couldn’t stop thinking about was why she was all alone in the ocean on the day she met Marlin. In ‘Finding Dory,’ she will be reunited with her loved ones, learning a few things about the meaning of family along the way.”

‘Finding Nemo’ has been widely seen as the best Pixar film to date, rivaling other ones such as ‘Up’ and ‘Toy Story’.  Many people thought that Ellen was robbed of an Oscar nomination for Best Supporting Actress for her role as Dory, as it has been stated in the for years that people who voice animated characters are always overlooked at award season time.  This sequel is highly anticipated and should be a great addition to the Pixar line of movies when it comes out in 2015! I know I’m excited!

Filed Under: BREAKING NEWS, ENTERTAINMENT, TELEVISION Tagged With: andrew stanton, disney, ellen, ellen degeneres, ellen degeneres show, Facebook, finding dory, finding nemo, instagram, oscar, pixar, toy story, toy story 3, wall-e

Career Transitions & You: Is The Grass Actually Greener?

by Chris Rinere

Is the Grass Greener in the job world? Should you transition careers? capilano Vancouver, bc - photo credit - chris rinere

Like many of you out there, I am sure you have considered a ton of new career choices over the past few years and/or career transitioning into new roles. The eternal question of Career Transitions & You: Is The Grass Actually Greener?

For a long time, I felt that the grass might be greener and my reactions would appear similar to the character, Dug, the dog from ‘Up’

While I knew I always wanted to end up in Education, I felt compelled to try this greener grass and explored different career choices. SQUIRREL!

Career Transitions! Grass is Greener! SQUIRREL!
Career Transitions! Grass is Greener! SQUIRREL!

During my four years in university I switched majors about 7 times (Sports Business, Marketing, Economics, Business Administration, Accounting, and lastly Education).

Fortunately for me, the past four years I have worked in recruitment, training and social media and I have finally  discovered the greenest grass possible and my true calling:  Higher Education Admissions and Career Advisement. I want to work with college students in regards to discovering their career development whilst in university. There is no looking back now!

While the positions I have held taught me about business practices, recruitment strategies, cold calling and sales, they have also allowed me to learn how the business world operates and conducts itself. If it was not for these experiences, I would have missed my true calling which was discovered through the conversations with thousands upon thousands of potential candidates looking for new job opportunity beyond graduation.

After closing the chapter in my last position, I am now ready to find myself a new role.  I want a career transition. Was I prepared for changing opportunities? No. Was I ecstatic for such a big change? No. But I am grateful for this moment because I am ready for a career change. I can almost smell that freshly cut grass.

One of the things that I appreciate the most is the networking tenacity that Adecco has taught me. The myriad of colleagues who I have met and gotten to know have each showed me a different way to connect with people and reach my potential – for that I am very thankful. I am not leaving because the grass is greener. I am leaving because I want to be in a career that will combine my love of business and education.

Now, before you get all excited and jumping for joy. Just keep one thing in mind and before you jump ship, ask yourself, “Is the Grass Actually Greener enough for me to make a Career Transition?”

Breaking into a New role: Is the Grass Greener? if-the-grass-is-greener-on-the-other-side
Breaking into a New Role: Is the Grass Greener? Are you ready for a Career Transition?

 

If you spend even just a few moments to research this answer, you may just save yourself from a lifetime of regrets and ‘what-if’s.

1) Analyze the Work Environment/Current position. First things first, are there areas for advancement in this current position? If you want to grow within your position or advance be sure that you are in the right job that will allow you to accomplish this goal.

On the flip side  do you foresee your current job disappearing anywhere in the next year? 5 years? 10 years?  I understand this might be a challenge but by turning those wheels in your mind, it might help you find reason in staying or leaving a position instead of just stagnating.

Push yourself.

2) Apply internally. As I say to anyone who I have helped with career development, before you up and leave an opportunity try look within your company or current position and build the skills you would like to use in your next position. Hey, you might end up liking this new strategical approach and end up staying in your position; or you will utilize that experience to propel you forward with another opportunity.

3) Research that green grass. If you are positive that a career transition is in place for you, then conduct some intensive research. You need to make sure that this transition is right for you and will help your current situation.

Some new positions require additional schooling or certifications.

4) Organize your resume/cover letters. If you are actively job seeking, the resume and cover letter need to be spot on and perfect. No exceptions. Now that you are focused on a career transition remember to RELATE your current skills to the skills being sought for each position. While some jobs require additional degrees and years of experience, many of these jobs have skills that are transferable from other fields.

5. Go with your gut. Changing careers is scary. Very scary. The ‘what-if’ and ‘grass is greener’ mentality sets in and the idea of committing to anything becomes more and more challenging. But if you can relax a bit, the process will give you confidence in your abilities and you will hopefully be starting a position in a field that you are truly passionate about.

 

Have any of you ever transitioned careers before and lived to tell the tale? Let’s hear it! Is the grass actually greener? is it browner?

Filed Under: BREAKING NEWS, BUSINESS, NEW YORK Tagged With: A Career Transition, adecco, admissions counselor, career advice, career advisement, Career Choices, career consultation, career representative, career transitions, careers, changing jobs, college admissions, cover letter, disney, dug, Grass Green, grass is greener, Green Grass, memoir, pixar, resumes, second careers, squirrel, The Grass Is Greener, Transition Career, transitioning careers, up

Primary Sidebar

Navigation

  • HOME
  • OPINION
    • REVIEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • LGBT
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • ARTS
    • MOVIES
    • MUSIC
    • TELEVISION
    • THEATRE
  • LIFESTYLE
    • TRAVEL
    • FASHION
    • HEALTH
    • FOODIE
    • STYLE
  • POLITICS
  • SCIENCE
  • SPORTS
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • U.S.
    • NEW YORK

Footer

  • ADVERTISE
  • TERMS OF SERVICE
  • CAREERS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Legal

Copyright © 2023 · ManhattanDigest.com is run by Fun & Joy, LLC an Ohio company · Log in

 

Loading Comments...