• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

Manhattan Digest

All you need to know about Manhattan culture and so much more...

  • LIFESTYLE
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • LGBT
  • OPINION
  • TECHNOLOGY

politics

The Generation of Change

by Alex David Jimenez

Roughly six years ago, when my now fiancé and I had just moved in together, the United States Presidential election of 2008 made history. Just under a year earlier, when we began dating, I recall him saying that he didn’t believe that Barack Obama stood a chance of winning the election. He told me, though he hoped otherwise, that he didn’t believe that we would see a black U.S. president in our lifetime.

Ten months later it came to pass.

In the same respect, another remark my partner made, amid our many deep conversations during candlelight dinners and Sunday mornings-in, was that he didn’t wholly believe that we would see an America with full recognition and legal marriage equality among gay and lesbian couples. I argued otherwise. At that point of exchange, one state legally allowed and acknowledged same-sex couple’s right to marry. DOMA was however still constitutional – the federal government could legally overlook many of those rights.

Same Sex Marriage 2014
via nbcnews.com

Today, six years later, nineteen states legally allow and acknowledge same-sex couple’s right to marry, and DOMA has been eradicated.

Same-sex marriage is easily one of the most controversial and bare-knuckled fights any group of any respective community has ever fought. In our lifetime, and stretching back into the history of American rights, the gay marriage campaign is quickly becoming as divisive and as landmark as those of the abolition of slavery and women’s rights. While many did concur with my partner in his vision of a limited America within the span of our lives, and while many still do believe as such, it can be said that the shift in favor of a tolerant America is certainly in occurrence – right before our very eyes.

Why?

Just over ten years ago there were no U.S. states that recognized marriage as anything but between a man and a woman. In the span of only one decade, that number has gone from zero to 19. In each state where gay marriage is still illegal, there are lawsuits pending to challenge the fundamental ethics of the bans enacted. In these past ten years, something has changed. Something came about in the broad scope of politics and the voice of the people. There are certainly many factors at play, and ultimately there is an avalanche of causes leading to the change in overall American attitude. Yet what I believe is simpler: one event largely began to create transformation. Just beyond the past decade, the millennials began to vote. The millennials began to join the workforce. And the millenials were far more unafraid to come out as openly gay and lesbian than those generations before them.

© The Washington Post
© The Washington Post

The statistics are simple and speak for themselves. Since about 2004 there has been a rapid shift in the public opinion across America. The popular opinion that gay marriage should be illegal in America has sharply dropped in the last ten years from 55% down to below 36%, and falling. Contrastingly, the opinion that it should be legal has risen from 41% in 2004 to over 58% today. And climbing.

Ages
© The Washington Post

Where is this opinion coming from? Well, according to statistics, the majority of the rise is attributed to America’s youth. The millennials contribute a staggering 81% in favor of the legality of gay marriage, as opposed to the 44% of those who are in favor over the age 65.

Do politics play a part? Certainly. As does religion of course. And yet regardless of conservatism and strict dogmatic ties, the youth is still bringing forth the turn of the tide. The generations over the years have been very clearly changing in their position and stance on the idea that all couples should be granted the fundamental and constitutional right to marry in this, a free country of tolerance and diversity.

via the Public Religion Research Institute
via the Public Religion Research Institute

Many have no faith in the millennial generation. They believe that integrity and responsibility is veritably non-existent in the course of their futures. Yet it cannot be argued that they are certainly the generation of change, be it for the better or the worse. In the capacity of this particular argument, for those who have gay family and gay friends; for those who have been too afraid to come out of the closet in the past and have done so recently because of the upswing of acceptance nationwide; for those people, it is certainly for the better.

I for one believe that my country, the United States, will legalize and recognize gay marriages in each of its 50 states in my lifetime.

Filed Under: LGBT, OPINION Tagged With: 2014, change, Equality, gay marriage, generation y, lgbt, manhattan digest, millennials, opinion, politics, same love, same sex marriage

Home work: Filmmaker Yared Zeleke’s Origin Stories

by Jordan Mattos

Screen Shot 2014-03-10 at 5.03.38 PM

It takes a certain level of conviction to stay true to one’s roots when balancing the demands of a bustling metropolis. The filmmaker  Yared Zeleke is an Ethiopian storyteller who swims against the current, making films that detail his experiences back home and abroad. His first feature, currently in development, was selected as one of the 15 international projects for the Cannes Film Festival’s lucrative L’Atelier program in 2013. Raised in the slums of Addis Ababa, Zeleke earned his MFA in Directing from New York University’s Tisch School of the Arts, and has worked with various NGO’s in Norway, Namibia and the U.S. All the while, he has preserved his artistic integrity while redefining where he calls home. I had a conversation with Mr. Zeleke about current artistic pursuits and the conditions facing today’s artists in the Big Apple.

Can you talk about your upbringing?

I grew up in the slums of Addis Ababa during one of the darkest periods of Ethiopia’s 3,000-year history. Emperor Haile Selassie had just been deposed in a military coup and the country was consequently thrown into cycles of war and famine. The ongoing conflict and chaos in my country caused me to also lose my family and home while a young boy. Despite the disturbances, I had a happy childhood.

How has your sense of home influenced your next film?

My first feature, Lamb, is analogous to my life’s journey in that it is deeply personal and inescapably political. It is a semi-autobiographical drama about the heart, heartache, and humour of everyday life in my homeland.

You are now back in Ethiopia. How did you feel being an artist in NYC?

It’s challenging…

Your film The Quiet Garden (2009) is about people asking to escape from the city’s noise. Would you or did you ever live in Manhattan?

I once lived in the Lower East Side, right before it got out of control with rent and well-off tourists. I wouldn’t want to return there or probably any part of Manhattan even if i could. Rent, especially, continues to increase for meagre spaces even in inconvenient locations. More and more young people are moving in, who are not necessarily artists themselves.

Film financing is a complex matter, especially during times of economic difficulty. How do you manage?

Grants, grants, and more grants. My work has been funded by several major European sources.

Why do you think artists resist calling their work political?

Politics is such a dirty word.

Housewarming2

Your films directly confront difficult to dramatize anxieties.  Housewarming (2009) confronts dead-on the alienation felt by an immigrant woman longing to be back home while attempting to fit in at a stylish dinner party in Brooklyn. 

Housewarming is about homesickness, particularly as an immigrant in New York. Tigist (Patience) is a short documentary about a girl from the Ethiopian country-side who dreams of being a pilot and comes to California to learn to fly.

Women play an integral role in many of your films.

Strong women raised me in Ethiopia. My primary caretaker was my grandmother who was revered for her storytelling skills as much as she was for her coffee ceremonies. She was born in Kaffa, after all, the birthplace of the coffee bean.

Many of your stories deal with being an outsider and the relationship between defending one’s individuality or being accepted into a group.

The traditional African proverb,”it takes a village to raise a child”, rings true about my upbringing. The adults in my neighbourhood collectively looked after all of us as children by keeping us distracted from the horrors of the Derg with school, church, and the movies. I remember my aunt’s spiced bread; my cross-dressing cousin’s comedy act; the forested, majestic mountains surrounding the city; and the bonfires, singing, and dancing during the holidays. I incorporated all these memories into my stories.

For more information about Yared Zeleke and Slum Kid Films, visit http://vimeo.com/user942327

Filed Under: AFRICA, ARTS, ENTERTAINMENT, MOVIES, WORLD Tagged With: Brooklyn, Cannes Film Festival, Ethiopia, Filmmaker, homesickness, immigration, politics

Veep- The best darn comedy on TV right now.

by Ryan Shea

Veep S02 720p 1080p WEB-DL Bluray HDTV

I was watching the very boring Emmy Awards last month and to be quite honest the best part of the whole night happened to be when Julia Louis-Dreyfuss won her 2nd Emmy for her role on the show “Veep”.  Though I didn’t understand the whole bit with fellow “Veep” cast members Tony Hale and Anna Chlumsky, I did find the whole thing humorous itself so I thought I would take a gamble and watch it as it was On Demand  (Thanks Cablevision!)  It only took me about 2 days to watch the entire series and the conclusion that I got on it was that Veep is truly the best comedy on television for so many different reasons.  Each cast member brings something incredibly unique to the show that makes it really work as an ensemble comedy, something that seems to be a working formula for other shows like Modern Family and 30 Rock for instance.  Take this as “The West Wing” but with a lot more curse words and realism.  Funny indeed.

Julia Louis Dreyfuss, who many of us of course know for as Elaine Benes from “Seinfeld” (which earned her her first of four Emmy’s) plays Selina Meyers, a somewhat reluctant Vice President who was one time presidential candidate and former senator.  She feels that way because being second in command always has her feeling disregarded and discontent to the president, who is never actually named or shown on the series.  The president himself always seems to get himself into really bad situations and she seems to take the brunt of it.  And the situations that she gets herself into only seem to make it worse for the 2nd year Vice President, who had to deal with walking through a glass door and doing an interview in front of a pig getting roasted as two of the several issues she had to confront head on in the public (no pun intended).   She has her wacky team around her that seems to do a really good job at keeping her together and yet tearing her apart at the same time, yet just like many sitcoms there always seems to be resolve at the end of it.

veep05-1024x682

 

Of course, it can’t just be one person who makes an ensemble cast shine.  The supporting cast who spend their every minute supporting (and not so supporting) Selina are just as good if not better in certain scenes than Julia herself.  Cue in Tony Hale, who plays Gary Walsh,  Selina’s long term associate and confidant of her’s.  A longtime character actor, he truly broke out onto the scene with his hilarious role on Arrested Development as Buster Bluth, the youngest of the Bluth family in the hilarious but short lived FOX series (resurrected by Netflix).  He surprisingly beat all of the Modern Family contenders who are the usually shoo-in’s to win at the Emmy’s this year for Best Supporting Actor in a comedy and boy did he deserve it.  He plays the character in such a creepy yet funny way as he shows over and over again the lengths that he will go to keep Selina happy.  The first episode of Season 2 is a prime example when he goes beyond what is necessary just to find a particular lipstick for Selina.

veep

A big one for me at least include Anna Chlumsky as Amy Brookheimer, who plays the VP’s chief of staff.  Most of us of course remember her for her role in “My Girl” over fifteen years ago.  Now she has taken back the spotlight on cue with her witty and funny role that often at most times has her delivering some of the best lines possible.  Best example for me is when her sister tricks her into thinking her father is dying.  When she visits the hospital, it turns out he is fine but nothing bad has happened yet.  After some back and forth banter, her sister says on the way out “Always have to get the last word in”.  Amy replies- “Well you’ve had three kids by two different men, so maybe your last word should’ve been no”.  Tee hee.  Love it.

Matt Walsh plays Mike McLintock, who is the VP’s director of communications and is oft times the one at the end of a really cruel joke, in particular just how in debt he is and how desperate he is to sell his boat to try to get out of debt (watch the show for more).  Under him is Reid Scott playing Dan Egan, who is the deputy director of communications and on again/off again lover of Amy’s.  Finally rounding things out is my particular favorite, the stone faced Sue Wilson played by Sufe Bradshaw, who kills it as the personal assistant to Selina’s.  She is a takes no prisoner type of character and someone who is really blossoming on this series.

I don’t want to give too much away in this article because anyone who reads this should immediately go and watch the show, but for the people who do watch it- season 3 is going to be off the chain seeing how season 2 ended.  Go to their official website to watch full episodes and be on the lookout for season 3 when it starts sometime in 2014.  Can’t wait!

Filed Under: ENTERTAINMENT, OPINION, TELEVISION Tagged With: anna chlumsky, julia louis dreyfuss, my girl, politics, president, selina meyer, tony hale, Veep, vice president

Is Casual too Casual?

by Walter Reed

Barneys Bag small
All around me, people are having sex: It can be great and not so great. Sex with an ex or Rex, a complete stranger, can be good and plenty. If “sexaholics” are the new “shopaholics,” then casual sex is the new black. Is casual sex something to try on or should it be left hanging in the sale section?

Some people cannot live without sex. Some need to take their potential trysts from point A to the park bench. However, who should suffer at the handcuffed hands of these shameless sex addicts? Which leads to my ultimate question: in the age of un-innocence, should we buy into things that we can’t return?

However, something should be said about the number of people hooking up at an alarming rate. With the age range being from grade school to the retirement home. It effects us more than you think. The guy I dated told me about a past sexual encounter, starring the surprising tight grandma. I gagged–literally.

“She was recently divorced, and my friend’s grandma was always nice to me,” he said. “So, I said fuck it lets do it. Shit, it was the best ass i ever had.”

I can’t. Could you imagine? That sounds like a gift that repeats. I wonder why he is now dating men. I guess I have to compete with grandma for the best ass in the city.

However, the lure of a casual encounter can be so enticing that all logic is thrown out of your bedroom window. Within a snap I could be on app. Usually that time would have been best spent taking a nap. A warm body next to mine is preferred after midnight. Why the sudden craving? It’s certainly better than Warm Bodies, that tragic movie about a Vampire and a human falling in love. Don’t get me started. The premise alone makes me want to grab an apple martini and run for the hills.

Casual sex is like a cheap champagne. A mixture of manufactured emotions and bottled up urges popped and released after shaking it too much. The next morning you wonder who’s in your bed and more importantly when are they leaving. So, you quickly tell them that you have to go to work and that he needs to go; or in the words of Sweet Brown, he needs to run for his life without no shoes on or nothing Jesus.

Thoughts turn to a situation I had when I asked a guy to leave; he had the nerve to ask me for money for his metro card. Oh no he didn’t. I knew I should have invested my time in a better bottle of champagne. In therapy, they would have called this a break-through.

When the time arrives, have a couple try-on sessions, get a second opinion, and make sure they have a generous return policy. No one wants buyer’s remorse.

Filed Under: FASHION, LIFESTYLE, OPINION Tagged With: barney's, buyer's remorse, casual sex, champagne, politics, sex, warm bodies

Gay Rights in America: What will the Outcome be?

by Alex David Jimenez

With the unofficial start of summer having come and gone, June is quickly approaching. For those fighting in favor of gay rights a great and ominous question is now beginning to ruminate: What will be the Supreme Court’s rulings for the United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry cases argued at the end of March?

Edie Windsor & her late wife Thea Spyer © ACLU
Edie Windsor & her late wife Thea Spyer © ACLU

Opinions are varied. Many will argue that the time of justice for the LGBT community is here. The United States cannot afford to further delay the institution of equality among varied sexual identities. By contrast, many have said the event of great change is well ahead of its time. While public opinion appears to suggest that America is leaning towards a more modern understanding of homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality and gender identity, therein remains the argument of morality. Morality, though relative, often wins, which suggests that while America is listening more, they don’t yet wholly accept it.

In New York, there has been a significant rise in crimes against the gay community – especially involving violent crimes against gay men. Several openly gay men, including activists and well-known members of the community, have been taunted with callous gay slurs and in some cases beaten, leaving them hospital-bound. In one case on May 17th a young man was in fact killed after being taunted by hate-mongering bullies for being gay. The word of homicide quickly spread through the community and put everyone on very high alert.

This rise in crime has been said to be a psychological backlash against the growing support for gay rights, including gay marriage. Twelve states have officially recognized gay marriage as legitimate and fully legal, including New York itself. This spread of success for the gay community has left those in its opposition with a sense of failure and fear that they are losing the battle. It can be said that fear breeds anger and hate, which is what we are seeing more prominently with every equal rights milestone.

Hollingsworth v. Perry plaintiffs Sandra B. Stier and Kristin M. Perry (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)
Hollingsworth v. Perry plaintiffs Sandra B. Stier and Kristin M. Perry (REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst)

The Supreme Court’s official rulings for United States v. Windsor, which includes the upholding or the dismissal of DOMA, and Hollingsworth v. Perry, which includes the upholding or dismissal of California’s Proposition 8, are both expected at the end of June this year. What is to be expected?

Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy © Wikipedia
Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy © Wikipedia

Many experts say it could be a tight ruling. The liberal and conservative extremes among the collective justices do not seem to necessarily be playing a major role in the direction with which they lean. Many conservatives have been outspoken in favor of gay rights, while many liberals have argued against it. It has been implied as of recent that the swing vote could be Justice Anthony Kennedy. Justice Kennedy has been the swing vote for several cases in the recent past. Since the initial hearing in March, three U.S. states and three countries, including France, have passed gay marriage. It is certainly realistic that these landmark events have influenced Justice Kennedy, as well as others, in favor of striking down DOMA and Proposition 8 this June.

 

Filed Under: POLITICS, U.S. Tagged With: doma, equal rights, gay, gay rights, NEW YORK, politics, prop 8, United States

Brooklyn DA Tries To Be Jack Of All Trades, Masters None

by Michael Tyminski

Michael Vecchione and Lawrence Oh, two of the attorneys on Brooklyn DA (Source: CBS)
Michael Vecchione and Lawrence Oh, two of the attorneys on Brooklyn DA (Source: CBS)
Michael Vecchione and Lawrence Oh, two of the attorneys on Brooklyn DA (Source: CBS)

Brooklyn DA: Tuesdays at 10pm Eastern on CBS

It’s not every day you hear about a new TV show being stuck in some real political wrangling. However, CBS’s latest Tuesday night reality offering ended up being the victim of such a case with its’ new show Brooklyn DA which only finally was cleared to air earlier today when a political rival tried to get it delayed until after a political primary amid concerns that the show would basically turn into a multi-million dollar campaign ad for his opponent (district attorneys are elected by the general public in New York State).

Brooklyn DA follows the attorneys office of Charles Hynes, the real life lawyer in the titular role and his assistants as they piece together cases for real-life crimes. The six part series also looks into the professional and personal lives of many of the special assistants whom work in the office as they struggle to piece together high profile cases.

We open with Lawrence Oh, who’s in a local deli where he’s picking up food on the way to work. Mr. Oh is investigating a theft of three pieces of fine art and is looking to set up a sting for his proposed suspect. We then meet Kathryn Collins, an assistant DA who deals with human trafficking and is looking to put a pimp behind bars. Ken Taub handles our episodes third case: the murder of a Brooklyn police officer in the line of duty.

For a documentary, it’s an incredibly slickly shot show, with large amounts of stylish graphical packages (especially in transitions), inventive editing juxtapositions, and a staggeringly high number of camera angles. These are particularly notable in the places where they couldn’t actually send cameras, such as when they couldn’t bring cameras into the courtroom for the plaintiff’s testimony, leading to a composite shot of our plaintiff and Kathleen, while cross examination gave us a composite of the plaintiff and the defendant’s attorney.

One thing I was somewhat surprised about was that the show did not ever really delve deeply into the lives of its’ featured attorneys (whether or not the featured attorneys appear on every show is yet to be known, CBS was fairly mum about the exact details of the show). We get a couple of short segments of Lawrence talking about his love for food and that he’s forced to eat in the office (one of these segments involves him doing so) and a very brief mention of Catherine’s husband.

However, for all of the technical wizardry, I question the degree to which the producers drag the victims of these crimes through. While it can at least somewhat justified to have the family of the fallen police officer talk a little about their father, I felt completely uncomfortable about the fact that the victim of a sexual assault (and to a lesser degree human trafficking) was very heavily featured with no pixelation or voice alteration or name alteration. While in this instance the offender might be a small-time criminal, it seems very odd that you would open up a victim for potential retaliation on prime time national TV. This is even worse when you consider that the show is produced under the guise of the news department, whom typically have used some or all of these protection methods for years.

As for the other ethical question? Simply put, while the show seems pretty clearly within the law (Hynes doesn’t appear in the first episode, but a fairly controversial surrogate is prominent), I can also understand why the opposition would have their gripes. The fact of the matter is, politicians have sued for less and anything other than a perfectly neutral and unbiased portrayal could potentially swing an election with a megaphone that large. What makes this worse is that while the timing seems least important from a network TV perspective, it’s salient a little too close to the primary (the series will end in July, the primary in question is in September) for anyone to claim that this show won’t potentially swing a pivotal local election in the form of airtime that would run in value about the same as a full campaign for a high-end U.S. Senate election. Luckily, we’re one episode in with one big mistake and a second one illustrated in the preview for our second show so hopefully Brooklyn DA stays a fairly evenhanded portrayal.

The Final Verdict: Brooklyn DA tries to have the slickness of a drama while operating under the guise of reality. What we get instead is a show that seems pretty devoid of both, with a whole slew of other ethical questions as the cherry to this non-sundae. In a lot of ways, you get the vibe that CBS was looking for a less expensive reality analogue to it’s crime drama heavy Tuesday lineup. Skip this and toss on a rerun of Law and Order if you’re looking for some courtroom drama.

Filed Under: ENTERTAINMENT, NEW YORK, OPINION, REVIEWS, TELEVISION, uncategorized Tagged With: Brooklyn DA, CBS, Charles Hynes, politics, TV reviews

Anthony Weiner: Comeback Politics for the Disgraced Politician

by Alex David Jimenez

Dear New Yorkers: For your consideration, disgraced politician Anthony Weiner would like to be your mayor. Mr. Weiner, who of course was caught red-handed in an egregious slew of inappropriate circumstances involving suggestive personal photos and messages across social-media platforms, believes your good faith in his ability to change will see him through the election this November. Following in the footsteps of former disgraced political countrymen, Mr. Weiner hopes the malevolent tentacles of his abhorrent past do not fasten themselves to your brains, projecting only his sins into your mind when you hear his name or see his face. Your consideration, without consideration of his personal stigma, is most appreciated.

The question remains: can a disgraced politician return to the forefront of politics successfully while the stain of his or her wrongdoings is still fairly visible? Anthony Weiner accepts your challenge. Weiner, the former member of New York’s 9th District of The House of Representatives, faced great turmoil in June of 2011 when private photos of his genitalia and naked body, intended to be sent privately to a 21 year-old college female, were leaked by blogger Andrew Breitbart and went viral.

Anthony Weiner & wife Huma Abedin
(AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)

The scandal erupted quickly and the media exploded. Weiner initially took to the air and denied the photos were of him, claiming his twitter account had been hacked and that the source of the photos was under investigation. However, only days later Weiner held a press conference in New York admitting that the photos were indeed of him and that he had sent them. The scandal continued, growing more controversial as the politician had initially lied about it. Republicans began to call for Weiner’s immediate resignation. Under scrutiny, several Democrats, including President Obama, suggested it would be best for the Democratic Party if Weiner indeed did resign. He did so officially on June 21st, 2011.

That was two years ago.

On May 21st, 2013 Anthony Weiner officially announced his intent to seek candidacy as Mayor of New York City. In a YouTube video, Weiner presents himself as a morally changed man. The video features his wife, Huma Abedin (who stood by her man during the scandal) and his baby boy. By all accounts, the video is a strong presentation of a mayoral candidate who would represent New York well and would work for the people.

Therein lies the question at hand. What effect does Weiner’s disgraced past have on his chances of winning this election?

The question is best answered by observing the American public and their relationship with American politics. How much information does the average voter actually take in when entering a voting booth? Barack Obama won the 2008 Presidential Election for several reasons, but many will argue that it came down to the fact that he was simply more likable than John McCain. Obama became a social-media sensation, reaching millions of young voters John McCain could not touch. Yet how many of the young Obama supporters could accurately convey Obama’s political record? How many of them knew what Obama had achieved or failed as an Illinois Senator? The numbers would be minimal. The media gives the average American a largely black and white display of political leaders; more accurately, a red and blue display. There are many attributes to politicians we never seek to learn about, or even care about. It’s an unfortunate truth, but the general masses will concur that the most interesting form of politics is dirty politics. The public loves gossip. The public loves to shame those at the top.

What effect will this have on Anthony Weiner’s chances of winning the mayoral election this year? It will blind most voters. The ballot will be filled with names and numbers, but when it comes time to vote for New York City Mayor, most voters will not see the honorable family man presented in Weiner’s YouTube video, but will see what they remember: An irresponsible sexual deviant with no self-control. Whether or not Anthony Weiner would be good for New York (which many will argue he would) will matter very little. His past will haunt him even today. It’s not to say that he has no chance of winning; politics is a most unpredictable beast. But it will be a very hard fight for the outspoken public servant.

 

Filed Under: NEW YORK, POLITICS Tagged With: Anthony Weiner, Mayor, NEW YORK, politics, Scandal

Primary Sidebar

Navigation

  • HOME
  • OPINION
    • REVIEWS
  • BUSINESS
  • LGBT
  • ENTERTAINMENT
    • ARTS
    • MOVIES
    • MUSIC
    • TELEVISION
    • THEATRE
  • LIFESTYLE
    • TRAVEL
    • FASHION
    • HEALTH
    • FOODIE
    • STYLE
  • POLITICS
  • SCIENCE
  • SPORTS
  • TECHNOLOGY
  • U.S.
    • NEW YORK

Footer

  • ADVERTISE
  • TERMS OF SERVICE
  • CAREERS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • Home
  • Contact
  • Legal

Copyright © 2023 · ManhattanDigest.com is run by Fun & Joy, LLC an Ohio company · Log in

 

Loading Comments...